Skip to content

Conversation

@Solicey
Copy link
Contributor

@Solicey Solicey commented Jan 27, 2026

No description provided.

@Solicey
Copy link
Contributor Author

Solicey commented Jan 27, 2026

It seems that branch percpu has not been merged into dev yet?

@li041
Copy link
Contributor

li041 commented Jan 28, 2026

It seems that branch percpu has not been merged into dev yet?

Yeah, the verification was needed for percpu crate, and I pushed it onto percpu branch.

@Solicey
Copy link
Contributor Author

Solicey commented Jan 28, 2026

It seems that branch percpu has not been merged into dev yet?

Yeah, the verification was needed for percpu crate, and I pushed it onto percpu branch.

Is merging percpu into dev planned before we release v0.4?

@dallasxy
Copy link
Contributor

It seems that branch percpu has not been merged into dev yet?

Yeah, the verification was needed for percpu crate, and I pushed it onto percpu branch.

Is merging percpu into dev planned before we release v0.4?

the pr #238 (add percpu support ) has already merged ,is there another percpu crate? @li041

@Solicey
Copy link
Contributor Author

Solicey commented Jan 28, 2026

It seems that branch percpu has not been merged into dev yet?

Yeah, the verification was needed for percpu crate, and I pushed it onto percpu branch.

Is merging percpu into dev planned before we release v0.4?

the pr #238 (add percpu support ) has already merged ,is there another percpu crate? @li041

this pr #238 was not merged into dev, but percpu instead. Shall we create another pr to merge percpu into dev?

@dallasxy
Copy link
Contributor

It seems that branch percpu has not been merged into dev yet?

Yeah, the verification was needed for percpu crate, and I pushed it onto percpu branch.

Is merging percpu into dev planned before we release v0.4?

the pr #238 (add percpu support ) has already merged ,is there another percpu crate? @li041

this pr #238 was not merged into dev, but percpu instead. Shall we create another pr to merge percpu into dev?

please wait until percpu crate merge to dev. These changes are included in v0.4.

Removed unused import of get_cpu_data from zone.rs.
Removed unused imports for HostPhysAddr and __board.
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the riscv64 label Jan 28, 2026
@enkerewpo
Copy link
Member

enkerewpo commented Jan 28, 2026

BTW, should we enable CI build testing for x86_64 hvisor?

@Solicey
Copy link
Contributor Author

Solicey commented Jan 28, 2026

BTW, should we enable CI build testing for x86_64 hvisor?

Sure, I will add x86_64 CI test later.

@Solicey Solicey merged commit 6209532 into dev Jan 28, 2026
46 of 47 checks passed
dallasxy added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 28, 2026
new feature
1.PCIE Device Passthrough Refactoring #236
- Added support for PCIe systems on x86/arm64/riscv/loongarch64 platforms.
- Implemented three PCIe mechanisms: ECAM/DWC/loongarch64_pcie.
2.add support for ECX-2300F-PEG #254
3.add support for ur-dp-1000 #247
4.raise interrupt limit to 1024 for modern SoC support #220
5.add hv_end address output and clarify hvisor memory layout #224
6.improve per_cpu struct #255
7.support logical cpu id for riscv #243

bugfix
1.cpuid retrieved by `boot_cpuid_get` is corrupted in release mode #226
2.gits: add support for cmd MOVI #216
3.virtio:slove the race conditions caused by spinlock#241

CI / Code Quality
1.update GitHub workflows and labeler configuration #235
2.update ci for pcie #236
3.adapt log style from hvisor-tool #253

new board
riscv dp-1000
x86 ECX-2300F-PEG
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants