-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Add role-based access control for division management #98
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Greptile OverviewGreptile SummaryThis PR implements role-based access control (RBAC) for division management with a three-tier permission hierarchy (lead_developer, nav_head, nav_member). The implementation adds proper permission checks both at the UI level (button disabling) and at the action level (early returns in handlers). Key Changes:
Issues Found:
The RBAC implementation is thorough and follows good security practices by checking permissions at multiple levels. The loading states prevent premature redirects, and the permission hierarchy is clearly implemented with appropriate restrictions for each role. Confidence Score: 4/5
Important Files Changed
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
2 files reviewed, 4 comments
Additional Comments (3)
Prompt To Fix With AIThis is a comment left during a code review.
Path: src/components/divisions/DivisionManagement.jsx
Line: 839:842
Comment:
Missing permission check at handler start. While UI buttons are disabled, this function can still be called via dev tools or state manipulation.
```suggestion
const handleAddMember = async (e) => {
e.preventDefault();
if (!canManageMembers) return;
setAddingMember(true);
```
How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.
Prompt To Fix With AIThis is a comment left during a code review.
Path: src/components/divisions/DivisionManagement.jsx
Line: 884:885
Comment:
Missing permission check. Should validate `canManageMembers` and prevent nav_head removal by non-lead_developers.
```suggestion
const handleRemoveMember = async (memberId) => {
if (!canManageMembers) return;
if (!memberToRemove) return;
const isSelf = String(currentUserId) === String(memberId);
if (isSelf) return;
if (!isLeadDev && memberToRemove.role === 'nav_head') return;
setRemovingMember(true);
```
How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.
Prompt To Fix With AIThis is a comment left during a code review.
Path: src/components/divisions/DivisionManagement.jsx
Line: 948:949
Comment:
Missing permission check. Should validate user is a division member or lead developer.
```suggestion
const handleDeleteAirport = async (airportId) => {
if (!isDivisionMember && !isLeadDev) return;
setDeletingAirport(true);
```
How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise. |
|
@greptile |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
2 files reviewed, 1 comment
llamavert
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Summary
Implements role-based access control (RBAC) for division management, restricting member management and airport operations based on user roles (lead_developer, nav_head, nav_member).
Changes Made
isLeadDev,isNavHead,isNavMember) in the DivisionManagement componentAdditional Information
Permission hierarchy:
Author Information
Discord Username: aussiescorcher
VATSIM CID: 1658308
Checklist: