Skip to content

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Jan 22, 2026

Overview

Created systematic review of 55 open PRs to identify merge candidates, dependencies, and stale items. Document organizes PRs by readiness and semantic relationships. All PR references use clickable GitHub links for easy navigation.

Changes

  • PR_REVIEW.md (621 lines): Comprehensive analysis organizing PRs into actionable categories
  • PR References: All PR references converted to clickable markdown links (e.g., [#2515](https://github.com/igraph/rigraph/pull/2515))

Key Findings

Immediate Actions

  • 2 PRs ready to merge (#2515 clean, #2513 needs CI)
  • 1 major PR needs urgent review (#2485: autogenerate 108 functions)

Critical Conflicts

  • Parameter naming: #2458 vs #2450 contradict each other (vids vs vertices)
  • Resolution required before either can merge

Semantic Groupings

Identified 7 PR groups with interdependencies:

  1. Parameter naming (4 PRs) - resolve conflict first
  2. igraph 0.10 graph constructors (5 PRs) - review together for consistency
  3. igraph 0.10 other functions (5 PRs) - can merge independently
  4. Breaking changes (6+ PRs) - bundle for next major release
  5. Bug fixes (4 PRs) - low risk, prioritize
  6. Infrastructure (4 PRs) - may have dependencies
  7. Documentation (3 PRs) - independent

Stale Items

  • 5 PRs from 2023-2024 (oldest: 33 months) - recommend closure or rebase
  • 2 PRs explicitly blocked - resolve blockers

Document Structure

  • Executive summary with status overview and key observations
  • PRs categorized by priority and readiness
  • Dependency map showing semantic relationships
  • Actionable recommendations with timeline
  • Statistics by type, age, author, status

  • By submitting this pull request, I assign the copyright of my contribution to The igraph development team.
Original prompt

This section details on the original issue you should resolve

<issue_title>Meta-review: order open PRs</issue_title>
<issue_description>We have many open PRs and lost track. Which can be merged easily, which are dependent of each other semantically, which need more work? Create a list in a Markdown file.</issue_description>

Comments on the Issue (you are @copilot in this section)


💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

Co-authored-by: krlmlr <1741643+krlmlr@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Create list of open PRs with statuses docs: Add comprehensive meta-review of open PRs Jan 22, 2026
Copilot AI requested a review from krlmlr January 22, 2026 10:27
@krlmlr krlmlr requested a review from schochastics January 22, 2026 10:29
@krlmlr
Copy link
Contributor

krlmlr commented Jan 24, 2026

@copilot: Use clickable links instead of # for PRs.

Co-authored-by: krlmlr <1741643+krlmlr@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor Author

Copilot AI commented Jan 24, 2026

@copilot: Use clickable links instead of # for PRs.

Done in 7e1e804. All PR references now use clickable links to GitHub.

Copilot AI changed the title docs: Add comprehensive meta-review of open PRs docs: Add comprehensive meta-review of open PRs with clickable links Jan 24, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Meta-review: order open PRs

2 participants