Skip to content

Conversation

@tueda
Copy link
Collaborator

@tueda tueda commented Jan 27, 2026

This PR is currently intended to show what was compared against FeynGraph 0.1.0b4+gf7ae8f4.

Note that on the first run, some of the tests take longer, so the timeout in check.rb needs to be increased.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jan 27, 2026

Coverage Status

coverage: 58.046% (+0.006%) from 58.04%
when pulling 67daea3 on tueda:pr/test/vacuum-bubbles
into 9b0d11c on form-dev:master.

@tueda tueda force-pushed the pr/test/vacuum-bubbles branch from 334e129 to 67daea3 Compare January 28, 2026 12:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants