-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 278
feat: Add fallback checks in nativeDataFusionScan for unsupported features #3322
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Add checks for metadata columns, Parquet field ID reads, bucketed scans, and row index generation so that auto mode falls back to native_iceberg_compat. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3322 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 56.12% 59.93% +3.80%
- Complexity 976 1462 +486
============================================
Files 119 175 +56
Lines 11743 16173 +4430
Branches 2251 2685 +434
============================================
+ Hits 6591 9693 +3102
- Misses 4012 5129 +1117
- Partials 1140 1351 +211 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
comphead
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @andygrove
I'm thinking we should have generate some doc from withInfo to see all the unsupported features and it would also generate a scope of future work
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (scanExec.bucketedScan) { | ||
| withInfo(scanExec, "Native DataFusion scan does not support bucketed scans") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes it does, I think we just fail the Spark SQL test for not formatting the explain output in the same way. I'm confused how this PR is passing the test that #2888 added.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see. Thanks. I will move this to draft for now. Here is the related issue for the Spark SQL test failures, and yes, it looks like we need to update the diff for these. #3319
Part of #3312
Part of #3317
Part of #3319
Summary
CometNativeScan.isSupported()for metadata columns, bucketed scans, and row index generation🤖 Generated with Claude Code