Skip to content

Conversation

@GACLove
Copy link
Contributor

@GACLove GACLove commented Jan 29, 2026

No description provided.

… conversion modes. Clarify usage examples and update argument requirements for 'r2v' mode. Improve handling of R2V model processing and ensure proper error messages for missing parameters.
@GACLove GACLove requested a review from gushiqiao January 29, 2026 08:18
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @GACLove, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enhances the seko_talk_converter.py script by refining the 'r2v' conversion mode. This change allows users to convert a standalone R2V model to various precisions (FP32, BF16/FP8) without requiring a distillation model merge, improving flexibility and clarity in model conversion workflows. The modifications include updated documentation, usage examples, argument validation, and the core processing logic to support this distinct 'r2v' behavior.

Highlights

  • Clarified 'r2v' Conversion Mode: The 'r2v' mode now explicitly means converting a single R2V model to different precisions (FP32, BF16/FP8) without merging with a distillation model, providing a more focused conversion option.
  • Updated Documentation and Usage Examples: The script's introductory comments and example usage for the 'r2v' mode have been updated to accurately reflect the change in its behavior, specifically removing the --distill_model requirement from the example.
  • Refined Argument Validation: The validate_args function now correctly enforces that --distill_model is not required for the 'r2v' mode, while --r2v_model remains the sole requirement for this specific mode. Validation for 'both' and 'merged' modes still requires both models.
  • Modified Argument Help Messages: The help text for the --r2v_model and --distill_model arguments has been adjusted to accurately reflect their requirements across the different conversion modes, aligning with the new validation logic.
  • Implemented 'r2v' Mode Logic: The main function now contains specific processing logic for the 'r2v' mode, which involves directly converting or copying the R2V model to merged.safetensors (FP32) without performing a LoRA merge with a distillation model.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request enhances the seko_talk_converter.py script by improving documentation and refining the logic for different conversion modes, particularly the r2v mode. The changes clarify the script's behavior and make the argument validation more precise. The updated usage examples and help texts are also valuable improvements.

I've found one area for improvement in the new logic for r2v mode to make it more robust by adding explicit file type validation. Overall, this is a good set of changes that improves the script's usability and correctness.

Comment on lines +384 to +388
if paths["r2v"].suffix in [".pt", ".pth"]:
checkpoint_to_safetensors(paths["r2v"], merged_path, "STEP 1: Convert R2V model to safetensors (FP32)")
else:
shutil.copy(paths["r2v"], merged_path)
logger.info(f" ✓ Copied R2V model to: {merged_path}")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

The current logic implicitly assumes that any file for r2v_model that doesn't have a .pt or .pth extension is a .safetensors file. This is not robust and could lead to issues if an unsupported file format is provided. It's better to explicitly check for the .safetensors extension and raise an error for any other format. This will make the script more robust and provide clearer error messages to the user. Additionally, it's good practice to avoid copying a file onto itself if the source and destination paths are the same.

Suggested change
if paths["r2v"].suffix in [".pt", ".pth"]:
checkpoint_to_safetensors(paths["r2v"], merged_path, "STEP 1: Convert R2V model to safetensors (FP32)")
else:
shutil.copy(paths["r2v"], merged_path)
logger.info(f" ✓ Copied R2V model to: {merged_path}")
if paths["r2v"].suffix in [".pt", ".pth"]:
checkpoint_to_safetensors(paths["r2v"], merged_path, "STEP 1: Convert R2V model to safetensors (FP32)")
elif paths["r2v"].suffix == ".safetensors":
if paths["r2v"] != merged_path:
shutil.copy(paths["r2v"], merged_path)
logger.info(f" ✓ Copied R2V model to: {merged_path}")
else:
logger.info(f" ✓ R2V model is already at the target location: {merged_path}")
else:
raise ValueError(f"Unsupported file format for r2v_model: {paths['r2v'].suffix}. Must be .pt, .pth, or .safetensors")

@GACLove GACLove removed the request for review from gushiqiao January 29, 2026 08:36
@GACLove GACLove closed this Jan 29, 2026
@GACLove GACLove reopened this Jan 29, 2026
@gushiqiao gushiqiao merged commit 516a5de into main Jan 29, 2026
3 checks passed
@gushiqiao gushiqiao deleted the fix_seko_convert branch January 29, 2026 09:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants