-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
309 fixed power prior #315
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
@gravesti looks good. Was a bit surprised to see a vector of weights, as the fixed power prior is typically one weight for all the external data, right? (And I see that the test cases are doing this already). I guess there is no downside to doing it this way because it is more flexible and we can use it for eg IPTW weights. Seeing now that the stan templates is annoying, but still I bet this is the best approach. |
Yeah, we could go for specifying a number directly: |
|
@mattsecrest I've changed to a single |
|
@gravesti looks good! I like the templates in Maybe this? Before we submit:
|
|
Addresses #309 |
No description provided.